Media Center

Articles & White Papers

Oracle v. Google – Update // January 29, 2019
Oracle America, Inc. v. Google LLC is a series of related intellectual property law cases making its way through the courts for almost a decade, with the latest decision issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in the spring of 2018, and discussed in our previous article published on June 14, 2018. On Thursday, January 24, 2019, Google filed a petition for certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court.  Read more

Oracle v. Google // June 14, 2018
Oracle America, Inc. v. Google LLC has been dubbed “the World Series of IP cases” by one of the presiding judges. Others have referred to the dispute as the case that never ends. The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), ruled in favor of Oracle earlier this spring, opining that Google had violated Oracle’s copyrights. Read more

PTAB Grants Rehearing of Patent in Delaware Litigation // February 4, 2016
In a rare move, the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board recently granted rehearing of its denial to institute inter partes review of Greatbatch Ltd.’s U.S. Patent No. 7,327,553.  Read more

Events / Seminars / CLEs

May 30, 2019
Patent Term Adjustment and Patent Term Extension - What, Why, How
Mr. Nadel will be discussing Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) and Patent Term Extension (PTE) statute that effects the term of the patent. Read more

May 21, 2019
From Diversity to Inclusion: Creating A Culturally Competent Law Firm
Ms. Mazzeo will be discussing diversity and inclusion in a law firm setting.  Read more

April 26, 2019
Panitch Schwarze Attorney Presents at AIPLA Spring Meeting
Panitch Schwarze partner Dr. Lars Genieser will present at the AIPLA Spring Meeting in Philadelphia as part of a discussion on strategies and tactics to maximize efficiency when drafting patent applications to protect novel inventions in different countries. Read more

News Coverage

PTAB Declines to Review Panitch Schwarze Client’s Design Patent, Allowing it to Remain Valid // November 20, 2018
Law360 covered a recent decision by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) that effectively upheld a patent granted to Panitch Schwarze client Idea Nuova Inc. The PTAB declined a request for inter partes review of a patent held by Idea Nuova covering the design of a foldable chair. Read more

John Simmons Quoted in Law360 re Japanese Optical Manufacturer IP Case // March 29, 2018
Panitch Schwarze partner John Simmons was quoted in Law360 regarding a recent summary judgment hearing in federal court. The case involves the firm’s client Hamamatsu Photonics K.K., a Japanese optical manufacturer. Read more

Panitch Schwarze Administrators Co-Author Article for Law Practice Today // March 19, 2018 Read more

Press Releases

June 6, 2019
Panitch Schwarze Welcomes Patent Agent Sam Steiger as Summer Associate
Panitch Schwarze is pleased to welcome Sam Steiger to the firm as a summer associate. Currently a student at Cornell Law School, Sam is registered to practice before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Read more

May 20, 2019
Panitch Schwarze Promotes Krista Hart to Firm Administrator
Panitch Schwarze Belisario & Nadel LLP is proud to announce that it has promoted Krista Hart to the position of Firm Administrator. Hart previously served as Human Resources Manager. Read more

May 13, 2019
Chambers USA Ranks Panitch Schwarze Among Top IP Attorneys for 2019
Panitch Schwarze Belisario & Nadel LLP is proud to announce that the firm again has been ranked among the top law firms in intellectual property law by Chambers USA, a leading legal ranking guide. In addition, the firm’s Philadelphia and Wilmington, Delaware IP attorneys Martin G. Belisario, Ronald L. Panitch and Clark A. Jablon have been ranked individually for their prowess in IP law. Read more

Newsletters

May 2019 Newsletter Read more

February 2019 Newsletter Read more

October 2018 Newsletter Read more

Contact Us



By checking this box, I agree to the terms and conditions outlined on our Disclaimer page.
Email Disclaimer

Sending an email to our office does not create an attorney-client relationship, and none will be formed unless there is an expressed agreement between the firm and the client. Thus, we strongly advise against sending confidential or privileged information to us until you can establish such a relationship. Furthermore, we advise against sending privileged or confidential information through email at all, since we can in no way ensure the security of your email. In fact, neither this website nor the email system involved is encrypted, so you should not assume that your email is confidential. We cannot guarantee that someone else will not see it.

Do you agree to this Email Disclaimer?

I Agree I Do Not Agree